Articles | Volume 20, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/fr-20-37-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/fr-20-37-2016
Review article
 | 
19 Dec 2016
Review article |  | 19 Dec 2016

Odyssey in the evolution of a paleopathologist

Bruce M. Rothschild

Cited articles

Alvarez-Millan, C.: Practice versus theory: Tenth-century case histories from the Islamic Middle East, Soc. Hist. Med., 2000, 293–306, 2000.
Aufderheide, A. C. and Rodriguez-Martin, C.: Human Paleopathology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.
Bouwman, A. and Brown, T. A.: The limits of biomolecular paleopathology: Ancient DNA cannot be used to study venereal syphilis, J. Archaeol. Sci., 32, 703–713, 2005.
Brothwell, D. and Sandison, A. T.: Diseases in Antiquity: A Survey of the Diseases, Injuries and Surgery of Early Populations, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1967.
Cunningham, A. B.: Applied Ethnobotany: People, Wild Plant Use and Conservation, Earthscan, London, 2000.
Download
Short summary
Paleopathology is best approached collaboratively with specialists in many fields, after resolving linguistic misadventures. Proof of concept studies provide windows to recognition of disease and resolution of previous anatomical challenges. Trans-phylogenetic representation of disease falsified speculation that "evolution" precludes analysis through time. Once speculations were tested and verified or falsified, the paleo-epidemiologic approach allowed identification of patterns of spread.
Share